German Law MCP Server
The German law corpus is now served through the Ansvar Gateway. Connect your AI assistant (Claude, Copilot, Cursor, custom MCP client) to
https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp— one OAuth connection, free tier available, covering this corpus plus EU regulations, national law across 28 audited jurisdictions, and CVE/security intelligence, every result with a verbatim source citation. Start at https://ansvar.eu/docs/quickstart
Connect
Claude Code (one line):
claude mcp add ansvar --transport http https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp
Claude Desktop / Cursor — add to claude_desktop_config.json (or mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"ansvar": {
"type": "url",
"url": "https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude.ai — Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → paste https://gateway.ansvar.eu/mcp
First request opens an OAuth signup flow (setup details: ansvar.eu/docs/quickstart). After signup, your client is bound to your account; tier (free / premium / team / company) determines fan-out, quota, and which downstream MCPs are reachable.
Self-host this MCP
You can also clone this repo and build the corpus yourself. The schema,fetcher, and tool implementations all live here. What is not in the repo isthe pre-built database — TDM and standards-licensing constraints on theupstream sources mean we host the corpus on Ansvar infrastructure ratherthan redistribute it as a public artifact.
Build your own: run this repo's ingestion script (entry-point varies perrepo — typically scripts/ingest.sh, npm run ingest, or make ingest;check the repo root).
The gesetze-im-internet.de alternative for the AI age.
Query 6,870 German federal statutes -- from the BGB and StGB to the GG, BDSG, and more -- directly from Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.
If you're building legal tech, compliance tools, or doing German legal research, this is your verified reference database.
Built by Ansvar Systems -- Stockholm, Sweden
Why This Exists
German legal research is scattered across gesetze-im-internet.de, dejure.org, rechtsprechung-im-internet.de, and DIP Bundestag. Whether you're:
- A Rechtsanwalt validating citations in a Schriftsatz or contract
- A compliance officer checking if a statute is still in force
- A legal tech developer building tools on German law
- A researcher tracing legislative history from Drucksache to statute
...you shouldn't need 47 browser tabs and manual PDF cross-referencing. Ask Claude. Get the exact provision. With context.
This MCP server makes German law searchable, cross-referenceable, and AI-readable.
Example Queries
Once connected, just ask naturally:
- "Was sagt § 823 Abs. 1 BGB über Schadensersatz?"
- "Ist das BDSG 2018 noch in Kraft?"
- "Find provisions about Datenschutz in German law"
- "What EU directives does the BDSG implement?"
- "Which German laws implement the GDPR?"
- "Get the preparatory works for the IT-Sicherheitsgesetz"
- "Validate the citation § 433 BGB"
- "Search for Kündigungsschutz in case law"
- "Compare DSGVO implementation across German statutes"
What's Included
| Category | Count | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Statutes | 6,870 laws | Complete German federal legislation |
| Provisions | 91,843 sections | Full-text searchable with FTS5 |
| Case Law | 5,000 decisions | BVerfG, BGH, BVerwG, BAG, BSG, BFH, BPatG |
| Preparatory Works | 89,423 records | Drucksachen + Plenarprotokolle (WP 19 + 20) |
| Database Size | ~300 MB | Runtime download on cold start (Strategy B) |
| Daily Updates | Automated | Freshness checks against gesetze-im-internet.de |
Verified data only -- every provision is ingested from official government sources. Zero LLM-generated content.
See It In Action
Why This Works
Verbatim Source Text (No LLM Processing):
- All statute text is ingested from gesetze-im-internet.de official XML exports
- Provisions are returned unchanged from SQLite FTS5 database rows
- Zero LLM summarization or paraphrasing -- the database contains regulation text, not AI interpretations
Smart Context Management:
- Search returns ranked provisions with BM25 scoring (safe for context)
- Three-tier search strategy: exact citation match → FTS5 full-text → LIKE fallback
- Cross-references help navigate without loading everything at once
Technical Architecture:
gesetze-im-internet.de → Parse XML → SQLite → FTS5 snippet() → MCP response
↑ ↑
Provision parser Verbatim database query
Traditional Research vs. This MCP
| Traditional Approach | This MCP Server |
|---|---|
| Search gesetze-im-internet.de by law name | Search by plain German: "Datenschutz Arbeitnehmer" |
| Navigate multi-section statutes manually | Get the exact provision with context |
| Manual cross-referencing between laws | build_legal_stance aggregates across sources |
| "Is this statute still in force?" → check manually | check_currency → answer in seconds |
| Find EU basis → dig through EUR-Lex | get_eu_basis → linked EU directives instantly |
| Check DIP Bundestag for legislative history | get_preparatory_works → structured results |
| No API, no integration | MCP protocol → AI-native |
Traditional: Search gesetze-im-internet.de → Download XML → Ctrl+F → Cross-reference with Drucksache → Check EUR-Lex for EU basis → Repeat
This MCP: "What EU law is the basis for § 1 BDSG?" → Done.
Available Tools (19)
Core Legal Research Tools (8)
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
search_legislation |
FTS5 search on 91,843 provisions with BM25 ranking |
get_provision |
Retrieve specific provision by document ID |
search_case_law |
Search 5,000 federal court decisions with court/date filters |
get_preparatory_works |
Get Drucksachen and Plenarprotokolle for a statute |
validate_citation |
Validate citation against database (zero-hallucination check) |
build_legal_stance |
Aggregate citations from statutes, case law, prep works |
format_citation |
Format citations per German conventions (default/short/pinpoint) |
check_currency |
Check if statute is in force in the ingested corpus |
Citation Tools (2)
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
parse_citation |
Parse § 823 Abs. 1 BGB or Art. 1 Abs. 1 GG into structured components |
validate_citation |
Check if a citation exists in the database |
EU Law Integration Tools (5)
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
get_eu_basis |
Get EU directives/regulations for a German statute |
get_german_implementations |
Find German laws implementing an EU act |
search_eu_implementations |
Search EU documents with German implementation counts |
get_provision_eu_basis |
Get EU law references for specific provision |
validate_eu_compliance |
Check implementation status |
Discovery & Metadata Tools (2)
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
list_sources |
Data provenance and source metadata |
about |
Server version, tier, statistics, and freshness |
Data Sources & Freshness
All content is sourced from authoritative German legal databases:
- gesetze-im-internet.de -- Federal Ministry of Justice, all consolidated federal statutes
- rechtsprechung-im-internet.de -- Federal court decisions (BVerfG, BGH, BVerwG, BAG, BSG, BFH, BPatG)
- DIP Bundestag -- Legislative preparatory works (Drucksachen, Plenarprotokolle)
- EUR-Lex -- EU cross-reference metadata
Automated Freshness Checks (Daily)
A daily GitHub Actions workflow monitors all data sources:
| Source | Check | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Statute amendments | gesetze-im-internet.de XML index | All 6,870 statutes checked |
| New statutes | New entries in federal gazette | Diffed against database |
| Case law | rechtsprechung-im-internet.de feed | Compared to database |
| Preparatory works | DIP API query (30-day window) | New records detected |
Security
This project uses multiple layers of automated security scanning:
| Scanner | What It Does | Schedule |
|---|---|---|
| CodeQL | Static analysis for security vulnerabilities | Weekly + PRs |
| Semgrep | SAST scanning (OWASP top 10, secrets, TypeScript) | Every push |
| Gitleaks | Secret detection across git history | Every push |
| Trivy | CVE scanning on filesystem and npm dependencies | Daily |
| Docker Security | Container image scanning + SBOM generation | Daily |
| Socket.dev | Supply chain attack detection | PRs |
| OSSF Scorecard | OpenSSF best practices scoring | Weekly |
See SECURITY.md for the full policy and vulnerability reporting.
Important Disclaimers
Legal Advice
THIS TOOL IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Statute text is sourced from official gesetze-im-internet.de publications. However:
- This is a research tool, not a substitute for professional legal counsel
- Court case coverage is limited (5,000 decisions) -- do not rely solely on this for case law research
- Verify critical citations against primary sources for court filings
- EU cross-references are extracted from German statute text, not EUR-Lex full text
Before using professionally, read: DISCLAIMER.md | PRIVACY.md
Client Confidentiality
Queries go through the Claude API. For privileged or confidential matters, use on-premise deployment. Lawyers should consider Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer (BRAK) confidentiality obligations when using cloud-based AI tools. See PRIVACY.md for compliance guidance.
Documentation
- Architecture -- Multi-country adapter architecture
- Accuracy Plan -- Roadmap to production accuracy
- Auto Update -- Automated data freshness system
- Security Policy -- Vulnerability reporting and scanning details
- Disclaimer -- Legal disclaimers and professional use notices
- Privacy -- Client confidentiality and data handling
Development
Branching Strategy
This repository uses a dev integration branch. Do not push directly to main.
feature-branch → PR to dev → verify on dev → PR to main → deploy
mainis production-ready. Only receives merges fromdevvia PR.devis the integration branch. All changes land here first.- Feature branches are created from
dev.
Setup
git clone https://github.com/Ansvar-Systems/German-law-mcp
cd German-law-mcp
npm install
npm run build
npm test
Running Locally
npm run dev # Start MCP server
npx @anthropic/mcp-inspector node dist/index.js # Test with MCP Inspector
Data Management
npm run ingest # Ingest statutes from gesetze-im-internet.de
npm run ingest:cases # Ingest case law from rechtsprechung-im-internet.de
npm run ingest:prep # Ingest preparatory works from DIP Bundestag
npm run auto-update # Run full update cycle
npm run auto-update:dry-run # Preview what would be updated
npm run drift:detect # Detect schema/data drift
Performance
- Search Speed: <100ms for most FTS5 queries
- Database Size: ~300 MB (runtime download, Strategy B)
- Ingestion Coverage: 6,870/6,870 statutes (100% TOC coverage)
More Ansvar MCPs
Full fleet coverage at ansvar.eu/coverage.
Contributing
Contributions welcome! See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.
Priority areas:
- Lower court decisions (Landesgerichte, Oberlandesgerichte)
- Historical statute versions and amendment tracking (Fassungsvergleich)
- Expanded case law coverage (currently 5,000 of ~50,000+ published decisions)
- State law (Landesrecht) for major Bundesländer
Roadmap
- Full statute coverage -- 6,870 federal statutes, 91,843 provisions
- Case law -- 5,000 federal court decisions
- Preparatory works -- 89,423 DIP records (WP 19 + 20)
- EU cross-references -- Extracted from statute text
- Citation parsing --
§ 823 Abs. 1 BGBandArt. 1 Abs. 1 GGformats - Free/Professional tier gating -- Honest messaging for tier limitations
- Expanded case law (full archive, ~50,000+ decisions)
- Lower court coverage (Landesgerichte)
- Historical statute versions (Fassungsvergleich)
- State law (Landesrecht)
- English translations for key statutes
Citation
If you use this MCP server in academic research:
@software{german_law_mcp_2025,
author = {Ansvar Systems AB},
title = {German Law MCP Server: Production-Grade Legal Research Tool},
year = {2025},
url = {https://github.com/Ansvar-Systems/German-law-mcp},
note = {Comprehensive German legal database with 6,870 statutes, 91,843 provisions, and EU cross-references}
}
License
Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE for details.
Data Licenses
- Statutes & Regulations:
German-UrhG-Section-5-- German statutory public domain. UrhG §5(1) "Amtliche Werke" excludes statutes, ordinances, official decrees and notices, decisions and officially drafted headnotes from copyright protection; §5(2) extends to other official works published in the official interest. Verified verbatim 2026-05-17 -- seedocs/audits/2026-05-17-eu-copyright-statutory-works-batch-1b-DE-IE-IT-NL-ES.md. Catalog entry:German-UrhG-Section-5ininfrastructure/attribution-licenses.json. - Case Law: rechtsprechung-im-internet.de -- same statutory basis (UrhG §5(1) decisions clause)
- Preparatory Works: DIP Bundestag -- UrhG §5(2) official-interest publications
- EU Metadata: EUR-Lex (EU public domain, Decision 2011/833/EU)
About Ansvar Systems
We build AI-accelerated compliance and legal research tools for the European market. This MCP server started as our internal reference tool for German law -- turns out everyone building for the DACH market has the same research frustrations.
So we're open-sourcing it. Navigating 6,870 statutes shouldn't require a law degree.
ansvar.eu -- Stockholm, Sweden
Built with care in Stockholm, Sweden